TRUTH OVER COMFORT. ALWAYS.

AVERAGE BUBBA — UNFILTERED

The Playbook

We have covered some ground lately. We talked about the institutional church and the machinery it runs to protect its arrangements — who gets in, who gets processed, and who gets quietly shown the door. We talked about the human cost. The ones who left not just the building but God Himself because His people got there first. Those posts said what needed saying.

This one gets specific.

The machinery does not operate in the abstract. It runs on people. Specific people with specific moves they run so consistently, across so many congregations in so many zip codes, that it constitutes a playbook. Sister Holy Karen did not invent these moves. She inherited them. She has been running them so long she has stopped noticing she is running them at all.

Today we name the plays.

The Playbook Exists

Here is something the institutional church will not tell you. When someone starts asking honest questions — about doctrine, about practice, about whether what happens on Sunday morning actually lines up with what the New Testament describes — there is a response. It does not vary much. It does not require a meeting or a memo or a directive from leadership. It activates on its own. Like a car alarm that goes off when the wrong person gets too close.

The goal of the response is never what it claims to be. It claims to be about truth, doctrine, the integrity of the faith, the protection of the flock. What it is actually about is protecting the arrangement. The comfortable structure that suited the people inside it has been disturbed. And disturbed people with institutional muscle have a playbook they reach for without thinking.

Here are the plays.

Move One — The Public Ambush

This one requires a location. Somewhere public enough that the target cannot respond at full volume without causing a scene. A crowded restaurant works well. Other diners present. Food on the table. Your wife sitting right there.

The ambush works like this. Someone with a grievance — real or imagined — decides that the appropriate venue for addressing a brother’s alleged sin is not a private conversation. Not a phone call. Not a meeting where both parties can speak plainly and nobody has to watch the whole thing unfold from the next table over.

No. The appropriate venue is apparently wherever you happen to be eating lunch.

Jesus said in Matthew 18:15 — if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. ESV. Between you and him alone. That is not ambiguous. It does not say between you, him, your wife, his wife, and a dining room full of strangers who came out for a quiet meal and got a theological confrontation with their appetizers instead.

The ambush is not about resolution. If it were, it would happen privately. The ambush is about establishing dominance in front of witnesses. It is about making a point loudly enough that the target feels the full weight of public pressure. Lewis Grizzard would have had something to say about a man who picks a crowded restaurant to call out a brother in Christ. Probably something along the lines of — son, Jesus overturned tables in the temple. He did not do it at the lunch special.

Move Two — The Righteous Text

When the public ambush is not available, there is always technology.

The righteous text arrives at an unexpected hour. It contains a question that is not really a question. It is dressed up as concern for your spiritual wellbeing. But it arrives with the energy of a prosecutor who has already reached a verdict and is simply looking for confirmation.

Something along the lines of a text questioning whether you believe a certain practice is sinful. Not asking what you believe or why. Asking in a way that has already decided what your answer means about you before you type a single word back.

I am reasonably certain that when Jesus said go, He had not yet anticipated the smartphone. Or the passive-aggressive text message. Or the man who composes one at an unusual hour, hits send, and then waits to see what you do with it. Matthew 18 says go. In person. Privately. With the goal of gaining your brother. It does not say fire off a text and see if you can catch him saying something that confirms what you already decided about him.

The righteous text is not Matthew 18. It is Matthew 18 wearing a disguise that fools nobody paying attention.

Move Three — The Freeze

This one is subtle. Which is part of what makes it effective.

The freeze does not require words. It operates entirely through absence. The people who used to stop and talk during the fellowship break suddenly find somewhere else to be. The familiar faces develop a habit of looking just past your shoulder. The conversations that used to start naturally stop starting.

The particularly sharp version of the freeze extends to your wife. The women who used to speak to her in the foyer, who used to find her in the pew and sit nearby — they suddenly do not see her either. Not with hostility. Just with the particular selective blindness of people who have decided that association carries a cost they are not willing to pay.

Your wife did not write the blog. Your wife did not ask the questions. Your wife is collateral damage in a dispute she was never part of.

The freeze is not an accident. It is coordinated social withdrawal designed to communicate — without anyone having to say it out loud — that you are outside the warmth now. The arrangement has been disturbed and you disturbed it and this is what that costs.

It is also about as far from Galatians 6:1 as you can get without leaving the building entirely. Restore him in a spirit of gentleness, Paul said. The freeze is the opposite of gentleness. It is pressure dressed as indifference.

Move Four — The Whisper Network

The whisper network is the most efficient communication system the institutional church has ever developed. It requires no budget, no infrastructure, no bulletin announcement. It runs entirely on concerned conversations between people who would be genuinely offended if you called what they are doing gossip.

They are not gossiping. They are sharing concerns. They are processing what happened. They are checking in with each other to make sure everyone is okay given everything that is going on. The fact that your name appears in every sentence of those conversations is purely incidental.

The whisper network serves two purposes. First, it spreads the information — or the version that suits the narrative — to everyone who did not witness the original incident firsthand. By the time the network completes a full pass through the building, the story has been shaped in ways that are difficult to trace and impossible to correct. Second, it builds consensus. When enough people have had the concerned conversation, the freeze becomes self-reinforcing. Nobody organized it. Nobody issued a directive. Everyone simply arrived at the same temperature at roughly the same time.

The whisper network is gossip. The people running it would dispute that. Proverbs 16:28 would not — a whisperer separates close friends. ESV. The word whisperer is doing considerable work in that verse and none of it is flattering.

What It Actually Is

Here is what all four moves have in common.

Not one of them is Matthew 18. The public ambush is the opposite of going privately. The righteous text is the opposite of going in person. The freeze is the opposite of restoration in a spirit of gentleness. The whisper network is the opposite of keeping the matter between two parties until it is resolved.

Every play in the playbook is a direct inversion of what Jesus actually said to do when a brother offends you. And every one of them gets deployed by people who will tell you with complete sincerity that they take Scripture seriously.

That is the thing about the playbook. The people running it are not, in most cases, consciously malicious. Sister Holy Karen genuinely believes she is protecting something worth protecting. Brother Do-Right genuinely believes the text message was a pastoral gesture. The women running the freeze genuinely believe they are doing what the situation requires.

They have just never stopped to ask whether what the situation requires lines up with what Jesus said to do. Because asking that question would disturb the arrangement. And disturbing the arrangement is exactly what started this whole thing.

Paul wrote to the Galatians about people who corrupted the gospel by adding requirements to grace and using compliance as a sorting mechanism. He did not mince words. I am astonished, he said, that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ. — Galatians 1:6, ESV.

Astonished. The man who had been beaten, stoned, shipwrecked, and imprisoned was astonished. That is a word worth sitting with.

I understand the astonishment. I have felt it myself. Standing in a crowded restaurant. Reading a text message at an unusual hour. Watching my wife be looked through by women who used to speak to her.

The table was always going to go in the air. That was never the question. The only question was when.

Truth Over Comfort. Always.

Bubba has been doing this since the mid-90s — back when blogging meant something and opinions had to earn their keep. South Mississippi. Semi-retired. Happily opinionated. Definitively conservative. Pull up a chair or move along — either way, you were warned.

'Murica

SIGN UP FOR THE LATEST POSTS

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Recent Posts:

You can read what I think on these pages.
What are your ideas, opinions, etc?
Let me know here.